The project complexity, agile maturity of the team, company and stakeholders as well as customer priorities play a role in defining the sprint length. And there are no perfect answers.Īs with all things, working with what works best for the project or the scrum team should be accounted to define the sprint length. There has been a lot of furore on adopting the right sprint length. Why so much confusion around the “right sprint length”? In a developer’s words – “ready to ship or release to the customer”. Sprint Length is the defined interval within which the team delivers an incremental workable solution that meets the definition of done and therefore acceptable to the customer. Anything beyond 4 weeks is never agile scrum project management. We all know that Sprints can be of 1, 2, 3 or 4 weeks long at the max. The whole concept of sprint is to identify User stories that the scrum team would work on and complete within a specific sprint duration. And one of them is time-boxing your development cycle.Īs the name suggests Sprint is about getting things done swiftly within a short period of time.

Scrum deploys some of the most matured time tested guidelines. You have ample scope for improvisation and course correction just at the right time with minimum risks and cost exposure.Īnd primarily the reason why agile project management is the default preferred methodology of the marketing, product, engineering and development teams. In plain terms, whether it is about initiating, planning, executing or monitoring. I would go as far to state that agile offers adaptability at all levels of the organization. On the other hand, agile scrum project management is all about adaptability. So, considering you ran a 2 week sprint and the outcomes wasn’t as expected or doesn’t prove to be business worthy, your cost exposure is of just those 2 weeks.īut in the traditional waterfall model, any such decision can only be taken at a very later stage which makes adaptability a huge challenge and course correction is too time and cost intensive. The reason is, it offers a holistic view of the product roadmap and the journey ahead.įrom a strategic and business standpoint – stakeholders have frequent and inexpensive opportunities to improvise the product before committing significant resources (time, budget and teams). Development teams globally have been practicing incremental product releases for over a decade now and more vigorously in the last few years.

Sprint scrum